<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Historical Data Sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/01/26/free-historical-data-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/01/26/free-historical-data-sources/</link>
	<description>Stock Market and Investing Blog of Mebane Faber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/01/26/free-historical-data-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-4359</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=2475#comment-4359</guid>
		<description>I am almost certain that Yahoo Finance (free) actually gets its data from CSI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am almost certain that Yahoo Finance (free) actually gets its data from CSI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/01/26/free-historical-data-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-3594</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=2475#comment-3594</guid>
		<description>I am almost certain that Yahoo Finance (free) actually gets its data from CSI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am almost certain that Yahoo Finance (free) actually gets its data from CSI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AccuFundTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/01/26/free-historical-data-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>AccuFundTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=2475#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>Mutual Fund Data:  There are many free sources for mutual fund data, and many paid sources, but most are not worth the price.  Historical data for mutual funds has to be adjusted whenever a fund issues a distribution, otherwise the distribution just looks like a big price drop.  If you are using computer models, and your data isn&#039;t adjusted, your models will issue erroneous trade signals.  Trading on bad data can be hazardous to your wealth!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Yahoo Finance (free) gets their data from Reuters.  Reuters is especially slow at updating their data to reflect distributions.  I have seen delays of 6 to 8 weeks.  This is especially problematic in late November and December when most funds issue their distributions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition, Reuters doesn&#039;t seem to have any quality control.  Every day there are dozens of funds that don&#039;t get updated in the Reuters data base.  It&#039;s a very simple task to determine which funds have data and which ones don&#039;t, but they don&#039;t bother to update the funds that are missing, unless someone calls to complain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fasttrack.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fasttrack.net&lt;/a&gt; offers extremely accurate mutual fund data.  They generally update their data to reflect distributions within 24 hours.  It&#039;s well worth the price.  They also offer stocks data, and I&#039;m sure their stocks data is maintained with the same attention to detail as the mutual fund data.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.AccuFundTrader.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.AccuFundTrader.com&lt;/a&gt; is not affiliated with FastTrack in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mutual Fund Data:  There are many free sources for mutual fund data, and many paid sources, but most are not worth the price.  Historical data for mutual funds has to be adjusted whenever a fund issues a distribution, otherwise the distribution just looks like a big price drop.  If you are using computer models, and your data isn&#39;t adjusted, your models will issue erroneous trade signals.  Trading on bad data can be hazardous to your wealth!</p>
<p>I think Yahoo Finance (free) gets their data from Reuters.  Reuters is especially slow at updating their data to reflect distributions.  I have seen delays of 6 to 8 weeks.  This is especially problematic in late November and December when most funds issue their distributions.</p>
<p>In addition, Reuters doesn&#39;t seem to have any quality control.  Every day there are dozens of funds that don&#39;t get updated in the Reuters data base.  It&#39;s a very simple task to determine which funds have data and which ones don&#39;t, but they don&#39;t bother to update the funds that are missing, unless someone calls to complain.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fasttrack.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.fasttrack.net</a> offers extremely accurate mutual fund data.  They generally update their data to reflect distributions within 24 hours.  It&#39;s well worth the price.  They also offer stocks data, and I&#39;m sure their stocks data is maintained with the same attention to detail as the mutual fund data.  <a href="http://www.AccuFundTrader.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.AccuFundTrader.com</a> is not affiliated with FastTrack in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dskills</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/01/26/free-historical-data-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>dskills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=2475#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>Three others to add to your list:&lt;br&gt;Norgate Data (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.premiumdata.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.premiumdata.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;Quotes Plus (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qp2.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.qp2.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;Telechart (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worden.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.worden.com&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three others to add to your list:<br />Norgate Data (<a href="http://www.premiumdata.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.premiumdata.net</a>)<br />Quotes Plus (<a href="http://www.qp2.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.qp2.com</a>)<br />Telechart (<a href="http://www.worden.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.worden.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/01/26/free-historical-data-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=2475#comment-3585</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this - goes straight in the bookmarks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For currency data, where a centralised market does not exist (ie hard to source &quot;reliable&quot; data), I think Olsen Data is very good (but quite expensive) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olsendata.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.olsendata.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, they are behind OANDA FXTrade - which allows you to get free historical tick data if you have a funded account with them (check FXLabs) - I used this and this is rather good (as far as I can check...).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other than that, I use CSI over Pinnacle: they have an API that allows you to extract the data and manipulate it. Also their continuous futures contracts adjustments offer much more options - see: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.automated-trading-system.com/continuous-contract-options/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.automated-trading-system.com/continu...&lt;/a&gt; (also check related posts for API documentation and free code...).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CSI also offers free 10 year dataset (about 50 futures markets) with the trial version of TradingBlox (a back-testing software I am considering purchasing)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this &#8211; goes straight in the bookmarks!</p>
<p>For currency data, where a centralised market does not exist (ie hard to source &#8220;reliable&#8221; data), I think Olsen Data is very good (but quite expensive) <a href="http://www.olsendata.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.olsendata.com/</a></p>
<p>On the other hand, they are behind OANDA FXTrade &#8211; which allows you to get free historical tick data if you have a funded account with them (check FXLabs) &#8211; I used this and this is rather good (as far as I can check&#8230;).</p>
<p>Other than that, I use CSI over Pinnacle: they have an API that allows you to extract the data and manipulate it. Also their continuous futures contracts adjustments offer much more options &#8211; see: <a href="http://www.automated-trading-system.com/continuous-contract-options/" rel="nofollow">http://www.automated-trading-system.com/continu&#8230;</a> (also check related posts for API documentation and free code&#8230;).</p>
<p>CSI also offers free 10 year dataset (about 50 futures markets) with the trial version of TradingBlox (a back-testing software I am considering purchasing)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

