<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3rd Blogiversary, Risk Parity and Templeton Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/11/02/3rd-blogiversary-risk-parity-and-templeton-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/11/02/3rd-blogiversary-risk-parity-and-templeton-update/</link>
	<description>Engineering Targeted Returns and Risk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:42:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gerrydantone</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/11/02/3rd-blogiversary-risk-parity-and-templeton-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>gerrydantone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1918#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>Does this strategy with $1 stocks only hold at the market bottom or in bull markets? Does this increase of 244% correspond to the stock&#039;s betas?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wish I had the tools to test this myself.  Where would I get such tools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this strategy with $1 stocks only hold at the market bottom or in bull markets? Does this increase of 244% correspond to the stock&#39;s betas?</p>
<p>I wish I had the tools to test this myself.  Where would I get such tools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/11/02/3rd-blogiversary-risk-parity-and-templeton-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1918#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>Meb, in all seriousness, why not allocate a significant % to a strategy like this? I suppose it&#039;s because you would have to have been confident that the market was about to turn (and of course no way to determine that), else you could drop another 50%, who knows. Did you buy any of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meb, in all seriousness, why not allocate a significant % to a strategy like this? I suppose it&#39;s because you would have to have been confident that the market was about to turn (and of course no way to determine that), else you could drop another 50%, who knows. Did you buy any of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkM</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/11/02/3rd-blogiversary-risk-parity-and-templeton-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3109</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1918#comment-3109</guid>
		<description>Risk parity for the retail investor is hard to come by. Anyone know of a product that comes close?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Risk parity for the retail investor is hard to come by. Anyone know of a product that comes close?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorldBeta</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/11/02/3rd-blogiversary-risk-parity-and-templeton-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3103</link>
		<dc:creator>WorldBeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1918#comment-3103</guid>
		<description>I had their returns on here but they asked me to take them down.  If I remember correctly, it was down -30%? (Alpha did well however.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had their returns on here but they asked me to take them down.  If I remember correctly, it was down -30%? (Alpha did well however.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich126</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/11/02/3rd-blogiversary-risk-parity-and-templeton-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>rich126</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1918#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>Regarding the first paper you listed (“Engineering Targeted Returns and Risks”) do you know what the updated returns would be if it included 2008? I&#039;m guessing it would have taken a sizable hit.&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the first paper you listed (“Engineering Targeted Returns and Risks”) do you know what the updated returns would be if it included 2008? I&#39;m guessing it would have taken a sizable hit.<br />Thanks<br />Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
