<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Endowment Returns, &amp; A Paper About My Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/</link>
	<description>Stock Market and Investing Blog of Mebane Faber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason70</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-4302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-4302</guid>
		<description>I wonder how *any* strategy could be proven fail safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how *any* strategy could be proven fail safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-4300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-4300</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification-overview.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification-overview.html" rel="nofollow">http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-4303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-4303</guid>
		<description>However, I freely admit that I did not understand the paper&#039;s conclusions regarding volatility and drawdown risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, I freely admit that I did not understand the paper&#39;s conclusions regarding volatility and drawdown risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-4301</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-4301</guid>
		<description>Hrm. I disagree Name.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I got out of the paper was less that &quot;he&#039;s on to something&quot; and more that the Ivy model falls within the expected range for a random distribution of possible market outcomes. It happens to beat the market with historical data, but it could just as easily fall below in different market conditions. There&#039;s no intrinsic bias above the efficient frontier in this approach (which is a bummer, since I&#039;ve just implemented the Ivy Portfolio in my retirement account).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;m very curious to hear Mebane&#039;s take on it - I could easily be misunderstanding the paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm. I disagree Name.</p>
<p>What I got out of the paper was less that &#8220;he&#39;s on to something&#8221; and more that the Ivy model falls within the expected range for a random distribution of possible market outcomes. It happens to beat the market with historical data, but it could just as easily fall below in different market conditions. There&#39;s no intrinsic bias above the efficient frontier in this approach (which is a bummer, since I&#39;ve just implemented the Ivy Portfolio in my retirement account).</p>
<p>But I&#39;m very curious to hear Mebane&#39;s take on it &#8211; I could easily be misunderstanding the paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting, but it would be great to see how all of these endowments have done over the last ten years.  The worst performers this year could still be the best performers over the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, but it would be great to see how all of these endowments have done over the last ten years.  The worst performers this year could still be the best performers over the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmlp</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmlp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>actually inoddy the markets ARE NOT correlated. not sure how you measure correlation but commodities are not correlated to stocks and so on. sure, during a complete meltdown everything that trades pretty much tanks but that&#039;s extremely unusual. I think everyone but the complete naive expect the model to USUALLY underperform the sp. the key is that the we also expect the sp to rise over the long run and we&#039;re content with similar returns with less drawdown. I will be very surprised if the classic 5 asset 10 mo ma model does not underperfrom a bh of the sp from 2009-2018-and quite happy if it still makes 10% or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually inoddy the markets ARE NOT correlated. not sure how you measure correlation but commodities are not correlated to stocks and so on. sure, during a complete meltdown everything that trades pretty much tanks but that&#39;s extremely unusual. I think everyone but the complete naive expect the model to USUALLY underperform the sp. the key is that the we also expect the sp to rise over the long run and we&#39;re content with similar returns with less drawdown. I will be very surprised if the classic 5 asset 10 mo ma model does not underperfrom a bh of the sp from 2009-2018-and quite happy if it still makes 10% or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason70</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>I wonder how *any* strategy could be proven fail safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how *any* strategy could be proven fail safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification-overview.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification-overview.html" rel="nofollow">http://dshort.com/articles/2009/diversification&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>However, I freely admit that I did not understand the paper&#039;s conclusions regarding volatility and drawdown risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, I freely admit that I did not understand the paper&#39;s conclusions regarding volatility and drawdown risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/09/23/endowment-returns-a-paper-about-my-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1766#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>Hrm. I disagree Name.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I got out of the paper was less that &quot;he&#039;s on to something&quot; and more that the Ivy model falls within the expected range for a random distribution of possible market outcomes. It happens to beat the market with historical data, but it could just as easily fall below in different market conditions. There&#039;s no intrinsic bias above the efficient frontier in this approach (which is a bummer, since I&#039;ve just implemented the Ivy Portfolio in my retirement account).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;m very curious to hear Mebane&#039;s take on it - I could easily be misunderstanding the paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm. I disagree Name.</p>
<p>What I got out of the paper was less that &#8220;he&#39;s on to something&#8221; and more that the Ivy model falls within the expected range for a random distribution of possible market outcomes. It happens to beat the market with historical data, but it could just as easily fall below in different market conditions. There&#39;s no intrinsic bias above the efficient frontier in this approach (which is a bummer, since I&#39;ve just implemented the Ivy Portfolio in my retirement account).</p>
<p>But I&#39;m very curious to hear Mebane&#39;s take on it &#8211; I could easily be misunderstanding the paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

