<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market Efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/</link>
	<description>Stock Market and Investing Blog of Mebane Faber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: macclary</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>macclary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1500#comment-4278</guid>
		<description>Interesting paper &quot;Value and Momentum Everywhere&quot;; authors suggest that rather than operating efficiently the market swings between favoring value and momentum strategies. &quot;We study the links between value and momentum strategies universally across asset classes and their&lt;br&gt;connections to global macroeconomic and liquidity risks.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1363476&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting paper &#8220;Value and Momentum Everywhere&#8221;; authors suggest that rather than operating efficiently the market swings between favoring value and momentum strategies. &#8220;We study the links between value and momentum strategies universally across asset classes and their<br />connections to global macroeconomic and liquidity risks.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1363476" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macclary</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>macclary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1500#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>Interesting paper &quot;Value and Momentum Everywhere&quot;; authors suggest that rather than operating efficiently the market swings between favoring value and momentum strategies. &quot;We study the links between value and momentum strategies universally across asset classes and their&lt;br&gt;connections to global macroeconomic and liquidity risks.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1363476&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting paper &#8220;Value and Momentum Everywhere&#8221;; authors suggest that rather than operating efficiently the market swings between favoring value and momentum strategies. &#8220;We study the links between value and momentum strategies universally across asset classes and their<br />connections to global macroeconomic and liquidity risks.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1363476" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1500#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>AlanPendleton&#039;s point about the good Investars showing does seem to suggest some edge. Though note the VERY high turnover of the Investars portfolio and the fact that they don&#039;t factor in trading costs or frictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AlanPendleton&#39;s point about the good Investars showing does seem to suggest some edge. Though note the VERY high turnover of the Investars portfolio and the fact that they don&#39;t factor in trading costs or frictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1500#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Hi Meb,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, what do you believe is key to finding a sustainable edge?  (&quot;Don&#039;t publish once you find it&quot; doesn&#039;t count as an answer).  Maybe this would be a good survey question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Carl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Meb,</p>
<p>So, what do you believe is key to finding a sustainable edge?  (&#8220;Don&#39;t publish once you find it&#8221; doesn&#39;t count as an answer).  Maybe this would be a good survey question.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />Carl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1500#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>Are there any ETFs which track these highly rated multi factor stocks. I think there is the Hennessey mutual funds and Wisdom Tree dividend ETFs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any ETFs which track these highly rated multi factor stocks. I think there is the Hennessey mutual funds and Wisdom Tree dividend ETFs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toptick</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>toptick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1500#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>Table 1 (T-statistics on the most significant factors) shows that the predictive power of the factors has been dropping over time (even adjusting for the fact that the last period is 5 years and so has fewer samples than the previous 10-year periods).  See Zhijian Huang&#039;s papers &quot;Real-Time Profitability of Published Anomalies&quot; (or &#039;momentum of anomalies&#039; as I call it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Table 1 (T-statistics on the most significant factors) shows that the predictive power of the factors has been dropping over time (even adjusting for the fact that the last period is 5 years and so has fewer samples than the previous 10-year periods).  See Zhijian Huang&#39;s papers &#8220;Real-Time Profitability of Published Anomalies&#8221; (or &#39;momentum of anomalies&#39; as I call it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanPendleton</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/24/market-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanPendleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1500#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>What is the edge?  Good question.  Haugen has been publishing his methods since 1996 at least.  There shouldn&#039;t be an edge after this many years.  But according to Investars, Haugen&#039;s firm is top rated in the Quantitative category for most time periods, including the 3 month period ending yesterday -- up 38% vs 11% for S&amp;P.  I suspect the paper describes what he was doing last year, and leaves out a detail or two about what he is doing this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the edge?  Good question.  Haugen has been publishing his methods since 1996 at least.  There shouldn&#39;t be an edge after this many years.  But according to Investars, Haugen&#39;s firm is top rated in the Quantitative category for most time periods, including the 3 month period ending yesterday &#8212; up 38% vs 11% for S&#038;P.  I suspect the paper describes what he was doing last year, and leaves out a detail or two about what he is doing this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

