http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/01/links-2/ Stock Market and Investing Blog of Mebane Faber Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:24:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/01/links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2718 4th of July – World Beta – Engineering Targeted Returns and Risk Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:20:57 +0000 http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1352#comment-2718 [...] Head over to Twitter (you can follow me here), and I’ll be giving away some books in the style of The Adderall Diaries. [...] [...] Head over to Twitter (you can follow me here), and I’ll be giving away some books in the style of The Adderall Diaries. [...]

]]> http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/01/links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4366 Steve Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:45:07 +0000 http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1352#comment-4366 Not sure the numbers at the Market Rewind site are correct. Doing a 10M SMA on SPY (or IVV) gets a different number than the table has. In the past I've noticed this with other items on the summary chart. At the very least it seems fair to see that his calculations are not done as described in your book. Not sure the numbers at the Market Rewind site are correct. Doing a 10M SMA on SPY (or IVV) gets a different number than the table has. In the past I've noticed this with other items on the summary chart. At the very least it seems fair to see that his calculations are not done as described in your book.

]]> http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/06/01/links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2563 Steve Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:45:07 +0000 http://www.mebanefaber.com/?p=1352#comment-2563 Not sure the numbers at the Market Rewind site are correct. Doing a 10M SMA on SPY (or IVV) gets a different number than the table has. In the past I've noticed this with other items on the summary chart. At the very least it seems fair to see that his calculations are not done as described in your book. Not sure the numbers at the Market Rewind site are correct. Doing a 10M SMA on SPY (or IVV) gets a different number than the table has. In the past I've noticed this with other items on the summary chart. At the very least it seems fair to see that his calculations are not done as described in your book.

]]>