<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow-Up Post To Largest Company By Market Cap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/</link>
	<description>Stock Market and Investing Blog of Mebane Faber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Tour</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>China Tour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Mangan</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Mangan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/#comment-2062</guid>
		<description>OK, how about with leverage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, how about with leverage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Berglund</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Berglund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>Dennis,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t think this would make sense.  This strategy would only have an expected return of the differential between the returns of the fundamental index versus the cap weighted index, which Arnott and others suggest is only 200 to 250 basis points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this would make sense.  This strategy would only have an expected return of the differential between the returns of the fundamental index versus the cap weighted index, which Arnott and others suggest is only 200 to 250 basis points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Mangan</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Mangan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>Which suggests a possible strategy: long a fundamental index, or maybe the equal-weight S&amp;P 500, short the actual S&amp;P. And Mebane here is the perfect person to look into this trade&#039;s performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which suggests a possible strategy: long a fundamental index, or maybe the equal-weight S&amp;P 500, short the actual S&amp;P. And Mebane here is the perfect person to look into this trade&#39;s performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/08/26/follow-up-post-to-largest-company-by-market-cap/#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>The underperformance of the top stock or stocks by capitalization is a powerful argument for Bob Arnott&#039;s Fundamental Indexing approach. Among US large-caps, FI claims to offer a historical edge of more than 200bps per year versus conventional indexing, mainly because of this underperformance effect. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;j&#039;adoube</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The underperformance of the top stock or stocks by capitalization is a powerful argument for Bob Arnott&#8217;s Fundamental Indexing approach. Among US large-caps, FI claims to offer a historical edge of more than 200bps per year versus conventional indexing, mainly because of this underperformance effect. </p>
<p>j&#8217;adoube</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

