<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Volatility Clustering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/</link>
	<description>Stock Market and Investing Blog of Mebane Faber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3rd Blogiversary, and More Posts Updated &#8211; World Beta &#8211; Engineering Targeted Returns and Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>3rd Blogiversary, and More Posts Updated &#8211; World Beta &#8211; Engineering Targeted Returns and Risk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>[...] Volatility Clustering sure did rear it&#8217;s head the following Fall! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Volatility Clustering sure did rear it&#8217;s head the following Fall! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where the Black Swans Lie - World Beta - Engineering Targeted Returns and Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/comment-page-1/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>Where the Black Swans Lie - World Beta - Engineering Targeted Returns and Risk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>[...] However, this line of reasoning is way too simplistic.&#160; The basic math shows that the vast majority of up AND down days occur when the market has already been declining.&#160; The simple reason?&#160; The market is more volatile.&#160; The last eight months have been a perfect example.&#160; I updated the post I wrote back in titled &quot;Dow 300 Point Days and Volatility Clustering&quot;.&#160; An older post here - &quot;More on Volatility Clustering&quot;.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, this line of reasoning is way too simplistic.&nbsp; The basic math shows that the vast majority of up AND down days occur when the market has already been declining.&nbsp; The simple reason?&nbsp; The market is more volatile.&nbsp; The last eight months have been a perfect example.&nbsp; I updated the post I wrote back in titled &quot;Dow 300 Point Days and Volatility Clustering&quot;.&nbsp; An older post here &#8211; &quot;More on Volatility Clustering&quot;.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mebanefaber.com/2008/03/29/more-on-volatility-clustering/#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>Thanks for compiling the stats on these asset classes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is that correct that the GSCI, unlike the others, has higher volatility when above its 10m SMA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for compiling the stats on these asset classes.</p>
<p>Is that correct that the GSCI, unlike the others, has higher volatility when above its 10m SMA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

